PR-96: Non-Covered Charge — Can You Actually Bill the Patient?
The remit says patient responsibility. Whether that holds up depends entirely on what you obtained before the service.
Free appeal letter tool. Build a complete appeal for this denial with the free appeal letter generator — it fills in the payer, dates and claim details for you.
PR-96 is one of the most misread codes on a remittance advice, because people stop at the word "non-covered" and miss the part that matters. Reason code 96 says the service is not covered. The PR group code says the payer is assigning that balance to the patient rather than making you write it off. Those are two different pieces of information, and only one of them decides what you may legally collect.
The rule that catches practices out: a PR group code on the remit is not by itself authority to bill the patient. For Medicare, liability shifts to the beneficiary only if you obtained a valid Advance Beneficiary Notice before the service and reported it with modifier GA. No valid ABN, no patient billing — regardless of what the remit says.
PR-96 vs CO-96 — the Group Code Decides Everything
| Code | Who is liable | What you do |
|---|---|---|
| PR-96 | Patient | Bill the patient — but only with valid advance notice on file |
| CO-96 | Provider | Contractual write-off. Billing the patient here is a compliance problem |
This mirrors the PR-204 and CO-204 pair exactly — same reason, different liability. Read the group code first, every time.
Why the Service Came Back Non-Covered
Code 96 never travels alone. A remark code accompanies it and tells you which of these applies — and that determines whether you appeal or collect.
- ✔ Medical necessity not supported. The diagnosis submitted did not meet the payer's coverage criteria — closely related to CO-50. Frequently appealable when the documentation is stronger than the code submitted.
- ✔ Benefit limit or frequency cap reached. The patient exhausted the allowed visits or units for the period. Check whether the count is actually right before writing it off.
- ✔ Plan exclusion. The service simply is not a benefit under that plan — cosmetic procedures, some screenings, certain supplies. Not appealable. This is the scenario where advance notice earns its keep.
- ✔ Missing authorisation. Overlaps with CO-197. Many payers refuse retroactive authorisation, which is what makes this one expensive.
The Workflow: What To Do With a PR-96
Related Patient-Responsibility Codes
PR-96 sits alongside the other patient-liability codes you will see on the same remits: PR-1 (deductible), PR-2 (coinsurance), PR-3 (copay) and PR-204 (not covered under the plan). If you are estimating what the patient genuinely owes across several of these, the patient responsibility calculator does the arithmetic.
Frequently Asked Questions
Reviewed by Hassan Raza Awan, Founder — 4+ years of hands-on U.S. medical billing experience. General billing information — verify against current payer guidance and your contracts.
Appealing this denial? Check your appeal deadline with our TFL calculator.
Writing Off Money You Could Have Billed?
We audit PR and CO group-code handling, build the benefit-verification and ABN workflow that prevents these denials, and keep patient billing compliant.
Get Free Practice Audit Denial Management